Codex vs Cursor comparison
Compare Codex and Cursor in Code item by item — price, plans, specs, Korean support, and commercial-use availability. In the table below, use Show differences only to filter to just the differing rows.
Coding agent connected to ChatGPT
OpenAI's coding agent for writing, reviewing, debugging, and automating development work across app, CLI, IDE, and cloud workflows.
Edge vs. similar tools: It connects app, CLI, IDE extension, cloud tasks, and code review in one Codex workflow.
A code editor where AI is a first-class feature
An AI code editor built on VS Code and re-architected with AI as a core feature, offering multi-file editing and agent capabilities. It understands your entire codebase and edits multiple files at once from natural-language instructions.
Edge vs. similar tools: Its strength is the Composer agent, which handles multi-file edits across the entire codebase in one pass.
Item-by-item comparison
Pricing
- Free plan
- Yes
- Cheapest paid
- from $8/mo
- Plans
- 5
Specs
- Autocomplete
- Not supported
- Agent mode
- Supported
- IDE integration
- Codex app, CLI, VS Code-compatible IDE extension
Cross-cutting
- Korean
- Supported
- API
- Yes
- Commercial use
- Allowed
Pricing
- Free plan
- Yes
- Cheapest paid
- from $20/mo
- Plans
- 3
Specs
- Autocomplete
- Supported
- Agent mode
- Supported
- IDE integration
- -
Cross-cutting
- Korean
- Supported
- API
- No
- Commercial use
- Allowed
Codex vs Cursor: which should you choose?
- Codex and Cursor can be started for free, so you can see the results first without signing up.
- Cursor has the higher popularity score (Codex 86 vs Cursor 88), so it has stronger public awareness signals in this category.
- To integrate directly into your service, choose Codex, which provides an API.