OpenEvidence
Free planEvidence-based clinical decision support AI
A clinical decision support AI for medical professionals that answers clinical questions grounded in peer-reviewed literature such as NEJM, JAMA, and Cochrane.
vs. similar tools: Its core differentiator is delivering answers grounded in the latest medical literature with cited sources, making it the clinical search engine most widely used by US physicians at the point of care.
Overview
At a glance
- Answers grounded in peer-reviewed literature like NEJM, JAMA, and Cochrane
- Provides cited sources so answers can be verified at the point of care
- Free to use for verified medical professionals
- No Korean support, so it is hard to use as-is in local clinical settings
- No public API, which limits integration into your own systems
- Best for: Physicians and clinicians who need evidence-based answers
Read more
OpenEvidence is a clinical decision support AI for medical professionals that answers clinical questions. It grounds its answers in peer-reviewed literature such as NEJM, JAMA, and Cochrane, making it a tool tailored to physicians and clinicians who need to verify evidence quickly at the point of care.
Its strengths are source reliability and verifiability. It pairs answers grounded in the latest medical literature with cited sources, so users can trace the model's claims back to the originals. Its standing as the clinical search engine most widely used by US physicians at the point of care lends further credibility. In our evaluation its source-reliability score of 90 is the highest, backing up its identity as a tool built on cited evidence.
The limits lie in access and scope. It offers no Korean support, so applying it as-is in a local clinical setting is a stretch. It also provides no general public API, so integration with your own systems or electronic health records is confined to partner and enterprise arrangements.
In short, it fits physicians and clinicians who need answers and sources grounded in English-language medical literature. It is free for verified medical professionals, which keeps the barrier to individual clinical use low. If you instead require a Korean-language environment or deep integration into your own systems via an API, another tool is worth looking at alongside it.
Pricing
| Plan | Monthly price | Limits |
|---|---|---|
| Verified Clinician | Free | Free use for verified medical professionals |
Specs
- API
- No
- Open source
- No
- Self-hosting
- Not available
- Korean support
- Not supported
- Commercial use
- Allowed
Popularity
Buzz and recognition on absolute thresholds
Absolute-threshold score
85
High confidence4/4 signals
Each axis maps to a 1-10 absolute threshold where 10 means broadly recognizable. Collected: 2026-06-16.
Verified public benchmark: 1M verified-physician clinical consultations in a single day (as of 2026-03-10) Source
Related tools
By popularity
- Duolingo Max
Its core difference is layering AI voice conversation and roleplay feedback onto a massive gamified language app to strengthen speaking practice.
- Abridge
Its key differentiator is purpose-built for medicine: it transcribes patient encounters in real time to ease physicians' charting burden and integrates with EHR systems.
- Harvey
Its key differentiator is handling demanding legal work for large firms directly through models customized for the legal domain and rigorous security, with integrations for Word, Outlook, iManage, and SharePoint plus enterprise APIs (Assistant and Vault).
- Intercom Fin
Its key differentiator is outcome-based pricing of $0.99 per actual resolution rather than per seat, tying support-center automation costs directly to results.
- Clay
Its core differentiator is maximizing lead data accuracy through waterfall enrichment that chains multiple data providers in sequence, paired with AI agents.
Compare OpenEvidence
Last updated: 2026-05-30
All tools